Public Health Science Communication 2.0

Reflections on the cross field between public health & science communication

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Public Health Science Communication 2.0
  • Contact
  • Course in Public Health Science Communication
  • Social Media & Emergency Management

scientific social network

Is there a need for online scientific social networks?

Leave a comment March 22, 2012 Bjerglund

Disagreement, throwing back and forth of arguments is good news stuff – in television, newspapers, radio etc. But also on blogs can it be fun to follow – and actually blogs are a perfect medium for this, due to the interactive premises of the blog, with linking, comments function and the ability to share blog posts through other social media.

An interesting discussion I came across is on whether or not scientific social networks are of any use to scientists.

In the Huffington Post’s Science section, Mark Drapeau in February 2012 argued for why Social Networks for Scientists Won’t Work. One of his arguments was that there is no incentive for scientists to use social networks, as what makes a difference for their academic careers it to be published in peer-reviewed journals. He argues that reinventing social networks specifically for scientists is not the way forward and is in no way groundbreaking inventions. For this, he uses the example of the scientific social network ResearchGate and compares it with earlier failed scientific social networks like Labmeeting.

In addition to a discussion in the comments section of Mark Drapeau’s blog post, it triggered a response by the writters at Comprendia, a bioscience consulting group. In a post from March 2012 entitled What Is A Scientific Social Network? 6 Thriving and Inspiring Examples they argued against Mark Drapeau, claiming that social media may be of great interest for researchers to engage in, and present six examples which can be used to understand scientific social communities. Their main argument is that:

“The value of social networks for scientists lies in faster access to information relevant to their research and the communities that are made more available by new tools.”

Although not against these new scientific social networks, they agree with Mark Drapeau, that recreating a new science version of Facebook is not necessarily the way forward:

“Here at Comprendia, we’ve never advocated that Facebook should be recreated for scientists, as there are 700,000+ life science graduates in the US already using the application (according to the Facebook advertising application.), and they are likely already connected there to lab mates and colleagues.”

Having read both blog post, I am however not so sure if they are that much in opposition to each other. They both seem to be clear on the fact that scientists are already on Facebook, LinkedIn where they can connect, share ideas etc. Mark Drapeau seems only opposed to reinventing the same social networks for scientists exclusive, not in opposition to online social networking. The writers at Comprendia argues for the value of social networks in general, highlighting the strengths in allowing scientist to have much faster access to information relevant to their research and the ability to connect with other researchers here and now and not having to wait for the next international conference to discuss their research. Comprendia suggests that we adjust our definition of scientific social networks to understand the next steps towards helping scientists use them to thrive, but comes with no suggestion. What is the definition now and what would the like to see changed? I lack that from the blog post.

Something I do find interesting in Comprendia’s blog post is the argument that for the new generation of scientists social networks is already an integrated element in their lives. They are already connected to lab mates and colleagues and using social media for academic purposes would not be foreign to them. I think Comprendia have a very good point here; that there maybe a generation difference. And maybe the need for a new definition of scientific social networks is not as relevant for the younger generation, because it is already an integrate part of their lives.


Recent Comments

https://twitter.com/… on Crowdsourcing examples of how…
Bjerglund on Patient blogs – a useful…
Stine Nielsen on Patient blogs – a useful…
Awesome reading list… on Crowdsourcing examples of how…
Awesome reading list… on Back!… to a battlefield…

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 122 other followers

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Twitter Updates

  • If interested in following the stream of scientific publications on COVID-19 and its link to diabetes? A service to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 11 months ago
  • @hans_kluge @WHO_Europe Congratulation! And congratulations to the @WHO_Europe Member States! 1 year ago
  • @StineNielsenEPI @IdaDonkin @SSTbrostrom Var der men tweetede ikke. Mega spændende og en diskussion som kunne rumme… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 year ago
  • Great feeling to see my first article for Hjerteforeningens Fagnet (The Danish Heart Foundations news site for heal… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 years ago
  • @StineNielsenEPI @felly500 @Pottegard @iTrainEU @ESCAIDE @teachepi super cool! Great idea 2 years ago

Archives

  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011

Course on Public Health Science Communication Recommendations Reports Social media & emergency management Thoughts and ideas Twitter for sciene communication Uncategorized

#hcsm #scio12 Aurorahealthcare benefits blog blogging blogs BMJ Canada communicating science communication conference course education emergency management exam Facebook facilitation facilitator fkfsv graduate course guide health 2.0 hospital Journal club journalism LinkedIn live-tweet live-tweeting McMaster University medicine Nature networking networks online discussion peer-review peer-reviewed journals PloS public engagement public health public health 2.0 public health communication public health research public health science public health science communication public health sciences public health students research research communication researchers risk communication Schools of Public Health science science communciation science communication Science Online science online 2012 ScienceOnline2012 Science Online London 2011 scientists seminar Social media social network surgery Twitter Twurgery Universities University of Copenhagen videnskab.dk web2.0 WHO Wikipedia Wikiproject medicine World Health Organization youtube

Blogroll

  • Antoine Flahault’s blog,
  • Covering Health
  • international public health journal blog
  • Medical Museion at Copenhagen University
  • My favorite disease
  • PLOS blog: Public Health
  • Pop Health
  • Public Health Matters (blog of CDC)
  • Public Health Twitter Journal Club (blog)
  • Pulse+Signal
  • Signs of Science
  • The Pumphandle
  • UK Faculty of Public Health blog
  • Webicina – Social MEDia course
Blog at WordPress.com.
Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×