Public Health Science Communication 2.0

Reflections on the cross field between public health & science communication

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Public Health Science Communication 2.0
  • Contact
  • Course in Public Health Science Communication
  • Social Media & Emergency Management

academic career

An interesting union: Wikipedia + journal articles

4 Comments May 29, 2012 Bjerglund

Scientists and researchers who still haven’t considered Wikipedia to be relevant for their academic career or who perhaps disregard Wikipedia for scientific purposes all together, might have to reconsider their point of view. At least they will have to get used to the fact that social media is sneaking its way into the other-wise so stable and non-surprising world of peer-reviewed journals.

The Open Access journal PLoS have taken on the task of making science available for everyone to read. In their endeavor to achieve this they have now gone to a new level, and are trying out the combination: peer-reviewed articles + Wikipedia. By mixing the two together, PLoS hopes to meet a new level of interaction between publishers, researchers and the public.

The guinea pig for this experiment is the journal PLoS Computational Biology.

By introducing so-called “Topic Pages”, which are a new article type building on the style of a Wikipedia article, PLoS makes peer-reviewed articles which are published in PLoS Computational Biology available on Wikipedia. The benefits of these Wikipedia style articles are 1) that they will help fill a gap in Wikipedia’s computational biology content; and 2) that the articles will be subject to ongoing review of wikipedians.

A third advantage, highlighted by Bonnie Swoger in a blog post in Scientific American, is that it may play an important role in convincing scientists to take an active role in adding content to Wikipedia, and in using social media for science communication in general. Bonnie Swoger points out that due to the organisation of universities and other research institutions, using time editing Wikipedia, being on Twitter etc. means less time for lab work, field work and scholarly writing. All of which is what matters in an academic career. Scientists therefor refrain from social media (or at least use it as an excuse). The trick of PLoS’ Topics Pages, which turns peer-reviewed articles into Wikipedia entries, makes it possible for researchers not only to produce original published articles, but also to contribute to public knowledge available on Wikipedia, and thereby potentially reaching much wider audiences.

It will be interesting to see how this new concept works out. I could definitely see it as something useful also in public health related research, which due to its public nature is probably even more likely to be found via Wikipedia than topics within computational biology are.

For an example of Topic Pages take a look at the article Circular permutation in protein in the Wikipedia format and the same article in a regular journal format. Both were published in Wikipedia and PLoS Computational Biology at the end of March this year.

Read more about PLoS reflections on the Journal-Wikipedia alliance in this editorial.


Recent Comments

https://twitter.com/… on Crowdsourcing examples of how…
Bjerglund on Patient blogs – a useful…
Stine Nielsen on Patient blogs – a useful…
Awesome reading list… on Crowdsourcing examples of how…
Awesome reading list… on Back!… to a battlefield…

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 123 other followers

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Twitter Updates

  • RT @codiac2021: Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus (#codiac2021) is a #HybridConference bringing together people from all over the world to disc… 6 months ago
  • RT @codiac2021: Prepare for tomorrow’s conference Copenhagen #Diabetes Consensus (#codiac2021) on the impact and value of #userinvolvement… 6 months ago
  • RT @codiac2021: Use #codiac2021 to follow and join the conversations and discussions at the Copenhagen #Diabetes Consensus (CODIAC) confere… 6 months ago
  • RT @codiac2021: Join us live on 26 October 2021 at 9.00-12.15 (CEST) when we livestream from the Copenhagen #Diabetes Consensus (#codiac202… 7 months ago
  • If interested in following the stream of scientific publications on COVID-19 and its link to diabetes? A service to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 years ago

Archives

  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011

Course on Public Health Science Communication Recommendations Reports Social media & emergency management Thoughts and ideas Twitter for sciene communication Uncategorized

#hcsm #scio12 Aurorahealthcare benefits blog blogging blogs BMJ Canada communicating science communication conference course education emergency management exam Facebook facilitation facilitator fkfsv graduate course guide health 2.0 hospital Journal club journalism LinkedIn live-tweet live-tweeting McMaster University medicine Nature networking networks online discussion peer-review peer-reviewed journals PloS public engagement public health public health 2.0 public health communication public health research public health science public health science communication public health sciences public health students research research communication researchers risk communication Schools of Public Health science science communciation science communication Science Online science online 2012 ScienceOnline2012 Science Online London 2011 scientists seminar Social media social network surgery Twitter Twurgery Universities University of Copenhagen videnskab.dk web2.0 WHO Wikipedia Wikiproject medicine World Health Organization youtube

Blogroll

  • Antoine Flahault’s blog,
  • Covering Health
  • international public health journal blog
  • Medical Museion at Copenhagen University
  • My favorite disease
  • PLOS blog: Public Health
  • Pop Health
  • Public Health Matters (blog of CDC)
  • Public Health Twitter Journal Club (blog)
  • Pulse+Signal
  • Signs of Science
  • The Pumphandle
  • UK Faculty of Public Health blog
  • Webicina – Social MEDia course
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Public Health Science Communication 2.0
    • Join 123 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Public Health Science Communication 2.0
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...